The title
Obstacles and Disguises covers an ambiguous political and thoughtful scenario unfolded in video and sculptural installations, a new show by Swedish artist Charlotte Gyllenhammer. Her latest work (‘Observers’ a portrait of the kidnapping and release of the wealthy John Paul Getty III’s son) was shown at Moderna Museet in Stockholm last spring. She continues her investigations in this show by digging deeper into the consequences of mass media coverage of hostages, terrorist violence and political crisis in the activism movement of the 70s. The topic is as relevant today as ever with an increasing fear of terrorism,
|
�Olydnad� (Disobedience) 1997/2002, c-print, laminate, aluminum, 80 x 114 cm
|
but Charlotte Gyllenhammer deals with it from a historical point of view. In the 70s, the fear of kidnapping was as strong as the fear of terrorist bombs is today. Gyllenhammer encourages reflection upon the formation of our memory and the constitution of our subconscious defense. She tests the thesis that we are most deeply choked the first time we are confronted with extreme situations, for example violence. A feeling we later recall, for instance as an experience from our childhood, every time we face it. This is an effect the mass media takes advantage of frequently. As eyewitnesses, we find ourselves in the middle of a dichotomy of being the victim of and being dependent on mass media at the same time.
In her new work, Charlotte Gyllenhammer turns to what has become the symbol of where modern terrorism first proliferated. The floor of the gallery is painted light blue, which makes the spectator step into another space such as a gymnasium. The central space discloses two screens opposite one another showing news broadcast from the hostage crisis at the 1972 Olympics in Munich where Israeli sportsmen were killed when the police failed to rescue them. At one screen we see the general public gathering curiously – afraid – surrounded by police. At the other screen, we are confronted with agents from the German secret service trying to free the victims. The mission looks like a badly staged B-film in comparison with today’s advanced technology with timed suspense in television and proficient killing methods. Only the feeling of fantasy is juxtaposed by the presence of a personal claustrophobic memory embodied in the vulnerable position of the child.
In the 70s, Charlotte Gyllenhammer herself was a child and witnessed such events from a child’s perspective. The na�ve and sharp vision of the child is a continual topic in Charlotte Gyllenhammer’s work. In her new work, the child is the recipient where the interpreter takes that place in her earlier works. The children are locked up behind a wall of bars, staged at a gym show. Behind the wall of bars, three children formed roughly in clay are shown exercising. The audience becomes the spectator looking into the children’s jail by mirroring the screens of the hostage drama. In the other space of the gallery, a single child is performing on a trapeze above a blue octagon gym mat, which appears like a swimming pool. She wears sports pants and a golden chain only. She is a fragile sports symbol. And the whole gallery becomes a fragile sports scene like the stadium of the Olympics.
As in Charlotte Gyllenhammer’s other works the children are staged, objects. But they employ also as mediators of the fearful political and psychological realities we have to come to terms with. They are puzzle pieces we have to fit together to grasp our collective memory of terrifying events. And they function as warning spots – like our thoughts, the children are frozen clay objects, slowly drying and alienating our inner space. A feeling of alienation one also suffers from in front of Charlotte Gyllenhammer’s installation. The construction of a panic room leaves the witness cold as the one able of committing a scheduled crime.
Additionally, the new work consists of four key photographs, TV-size and TV-glossy where Charlotte Gyllenhammer has positioned a red-haired girl in still images from the two films from the 1972 Munich drama. The girl becomes a witness to the tragic event staged by mass media as well as a witness of the whole installation. She becomes the substituting carrier of our fear filled gaze looking from the outside at a sacrosanct crime. The gaze of the child is an image of our state of mind – the child being abused, a metonymy of the society being abused.
|