• The Double-Edged Worlds of Mr. Alberico – Kenneth Martina

    Date posted: May 1, 2006 Author: jolanta

    The Double-Edged Worlds of Mr. Alberico

    Kenneth Martina

    Inspiration can come from a variety of sources: from the things I read, see
    on TV or just observe during the course of the day. They can be things that make
    me angry or things that evoke a sense of awe like a visit to Mt Edna in Sicily.
    They can also be things as mundane as a trip to the shopping mall in Paramus,
    New Jersey. —-Rocco Alberico

    The complexity
    and contradiction of Alberico’s miniature worlds infer a working process
    of curiosity and an ability to embrace ambiguities. This artist’s concern
    is with culture’s skewed values. His latest series of small (7 – 27”h)
    sculptures are brightly colored building forms with unusual extensions and decorated
    interiors, a cohesive surreal village.

    The works reveal the broad understandings necessary to integrate art and architecture.
    They are postmodern in the sense that they exaggerate the referenced architectonic
    forms and contain ornaments which have unusual ocular functions. Exaggeration
    and unpredictability are central strategies. The sculptures contain the artist’s
    personal symbolic messages as well as a wake-up for American culture in constant
    need of reevaluation.

    The sculptures
    are contractions. The bright color and cheerful forms belie the underlying politics.
    In the seemingly happy dwellings, this artist takes on formal religion, corporate
    America, and Bin Laden, for example. Blatant messages of contempt on the interiors
    of the sculptures reveal Alberico’s agenda of cultural critique. The swastika
    is blended into the Turkish flag leaving the viewer to wonder what the Turkish
    Flag Regulation no.2/7175 of 1937 ever did to us. Toy soldiers are poised for
    action. Allah is referenced in an unclear manner. One can imagine a number of
    scenarios if the artworks were to become animated.

    If it can be argued
    that good art gives us the capacity to think and feel in reaction to it, then
    Alberico’s art that does just this for the viewer. Additionally, it invites
    conversation. Discussions could be based on aspects of beauty, play, the problematic
    relationship between politics and art, or on, perhaps, representing and perhaps
    misrepresenting culture.

    One can only imagine,
    as Alberico’s structures continue to be constructed, will they resemble
    Leon Krier’s version of a beach house, a “Toys are Us” Venturi-Graves
    vision, or will they be clouded by conspiracies and world events yet to be schemed
    . . . perhaps all of the above?

    Comments are closed.