• The Artistic Experiments of Patricia Piccinini – Megan J. Doll

    Date posted: May 8, 2006 Author: jolanta

    The Artistic Experiments of Patricia Piccinini

    Megan J. Doll

    The propelling force behind the works of Patricia Piccinini is that of pathos:
    mutant creatures, disembodied lumps of flesh and warped machinery are among the
    more frequent motifs of her sculptures, photographs, film clips and paintings.
    A prominent Australian artist with an evident ambivalence towards medical science,
    Piccinini deploys the mutation of traditional forms to stir and engage viewers.
    This effect is heightened by the verisimilitude with which these images are rendered;
    aided by specialists, Piccinini transforms silicone, acrylic and leather into
    something animate. The skin of her sculptural creatures is treated with great
    attention to tone, wrinkles, folds and blemishes. The hair she uses is real.
    The visibility of veins and moisture of the orifices suggest that these are living,
    functioning organisms. Piccinini’s photographs further enforce this bizarre
    realism by placing her warped sculptures in a “normal” context, co-existing
    with humans in mundane settings.

    The questions that Piccinini’s art poses are truly contemporary, though
    her formal strategies have historical roots that stretch as far back as the human
    animal mutations found in the work of Bosch. She challenges the viewer’s
    conception of what is normal and obligates one to consider the grotesque. What
    do we deem grotesque today and for what reasons? What does this imply about us?
    Embodying a time of life at which uniformity is coveted but prejudices have not
    yet crystallized, children are often portrayed interacting insouciantly with
    Piccinini’s mutants. In her photograph Social Studies, for instance, Piccinini
    poses a “Siren Mole,” a creature of her own invention, in an outdoor
    parking lot, surrounded by real-life boys. The young boys observe the creature
    with an enthusiasm and curiosity that is untempered by disgust. The innate acceptance
    of these children forces one to contemplate the apparent arbitrariness and artificiality
    of our value allocation. Piccinini emphasizes the extent to which repulsion is
    the product of social conditioning.

    Piccinini also references ethical dilemmas introduced by the likes of such scientific
    advancements as stem cell research, cloning and genetic manipulation. Her hybrid
    animal-human creatures unveil a disturbing facet of modern science, raising questions
    as to the morality of genetic meddling. While human hybrids have long existed
    in mythology –in the forms of sphinxes, mermaids, centaurs and the like—they
    have only recently become plausible. Piccinini rejects the romanticism of previous
    mythological composites and confronts the viewer with a less glamorous reality.
    The traits of a human and a meerkat coalesce in her Leather Landscape, producing
    a delicate, homely hybrid. Piccinini makes man’s attempt at playing God
    appear more pathetic than triumphant. The sight of human traits superimposed
    upon an animal creates a sense of revolt that borders upon degradation, serving
    as a further attack upon human vanity. In another ethically charged work, Still
    Life with Stem Cells, Piccinini depicts a young girl seated among large, fleshy
    globules. She smiles complacently, her gaze abstractedly fixed upon a stem cell
    situated in front of her. Her left hand rests upon a mound at her knee as she
    cradles yet another cell in her right arm, seemingly recognizing it as a fellow
    sentient being. The image is simultaneously touching and nauseating. These two
    works pose similar questions: What is the value of a human life? What is the
    value of an animal life? To what extent is it acceptable to exploit, merge and
    manipulate the two? Her works refrain from passing judgement and strive for objectivity,
    though the overtones of pathos present in her forms indicate her sympathies.

    The sense of malaise that Piccinini’s works inspire is countered by the
    humanity with which she treats her subjects, imbued with a tenderness that saves
    them from utter monstrosity. Far from being unkind or mocking representations,
    Piccinini’s mutants are approached with warmth and affection: "I see my
    works as my children," Piccinini asserts, "and I want what is best
    for them." Her images evoke a range of emotions: fragility, pensiveness,
    melancholy and compassion. The initial shock of Piccinini’s forms gives
    way to the contemplation of an art that is both insightful and saturated with
    social commentary.  

    Comments are closed.