• Second State – Aaron Yassin

    Date posted: June 19, 2006 Author: jolanta

    Second State

    Aaron Yassin

     
     
     

    Randy Stoltzfus, The Garden Gate, Oil on canvas, 96"x120"

    Randy Stoltzfus, The Garden Gate, Oil on canvas, 96″x120″
     
     
     
     
    The first time
    I visited Randy Stoltzfus’ studio in Brooklyn it was late in the
    day, nearly dusk. The light level was low, particularly as the studio had only
    a block of windows facing north. I began looking at the paintings expecting as
    one does that some artificial lights would be turned on so I could see the work
    better. As I walked from one painting to the next I realized that Stoltzfus was
    not going to turn on any other lights. Soon he said something to the effect of
    how this was the best light to look at the work. So, I continued looking,
    allowing my eyes to adjust. After sometime the darks in the paintings started
    to float with density ever more palpable by the images of fire. Then I realized
    I could no longer see the paintings anymore, I could only feel them. I was
    reminded of a passage from Jun’ichiro Tanizaki’s essay In Praise of Shadows,
    “We delight in the mere sight of the delicate glow of fading rays clinging to
    the surface…there to live out what little life remains to them. The hue may
    differ…but the degree of difference will be ever so slight; not so much a
    difference in color as in shade, a difference that will seem to exist only in
    the mood of the viewer.”

     

    At the time of
    this visit, Stoltzfus had just begun the earliest paintings that were recently
    shown in his first solo exhibition in New York. Stolzfus, who now lives in
    Brooklyn, grew up in the Shenandoah Valley as the grandson of an Amish Deacon.
    This personal history has shaped him as an individual and an artist. As a
    result, he creates work that is deeply embedded in the aspect of the American
    psyche that extends from Thomas Jefferson to the Transcendentalists (Emerson and
    Thoreau) and to the Luminists (Innes and Moran). His work continues the
    profound belief in the possibility of metaphorically finding oneself through a
    personal experience with the landscape. But for Stoltzfus it is not so much
    about showing us a specific place but rather something atmospheric, embedded in
    memory, history and light.

     

    Stoltzfus’
    paintings contain images of fields, trees, figures, fire, the sky and the sea,
    but these images always become part of the larger metaphor of each work that is
    experienced through their richly painted surfaces, subtle and powerful color
    relationships, and intense shimmering light. To achieve these qualities
    Stoltzfus mixes powered glass, iridescent pigment and even an occasional hint
    of gold leaf into his already complex palette of earth tones, warm and cool
    blacks, cadmiums, cobalt and ultramarine. The process of applying the paint is
    slow and often changes are made. It is a way of working that is romantic and
    may even seem by today’s standards as somewhat archaic. But for Stoltzfus it is
    this slow process that connects him with his past and his origins, and allows
    him to question his own place in addition to the specific signification place
    carries in our world today.

     

    The Garden
    Gate, a monumental
    work at 8 x 10 feet and the largest in the show, mixes the broadest range of
    earth tones into an intense crescendo of yellows and whites in the center of
    the image. It is perhaps an open gate that is full of light that we can imagine
    ourselves entering, a metaphor of crossing from one place into another. The
    quality is similar to the experience people speak of when they have returned
    from near death and are overtaken by an intense bright light.

     

    Housefire
    style=’font-family:Verdana;color:black’> presents a small house-like structure
    fully ablaze and floating in the deep recessional space of a dark and ominous
    rural landscape. The flames are so bright that they cast a shadow of the house
    on the ground intensifying its levitation. This house is on fire but it does
    not burn in its silence. Only the flames speak and they tell us that we are in
    this house, that we float in this place and, even though we may come and go,
    the land will remain. As Stoltzfus shows us this, even he is humble to its
    power. It is an allegory of the burning bush on the American landscape.

     

    Exploding with
    thousands of specks of luminous color creating a dramatic surface texture is
    the most abstract of Stoltzfus’ works, Sphinx
    style=’font-family:Verdana;color:black’>. In this image the landscape is merely
    suggested by the presence in the lower right of what looks like a tree. In addition,
    the bottom edge is darker than the top, which gives a sense of gravity to the
    composition. The subtlety of these elements is enough to key us into the
    experience and to signify that this is some place in the world. The brightest
    whites are most dense in the middle and radiate out to the edges. The effect
    pushes the ebullient light into real space directly confronting the viewer.
    Unlike Housefire,
    with its deep recessional space, this image denies entrance past its surface.
    This light that pushes outward draws the viewer in and once close the surface
    unfolds with its own magic of transparent and opaque whites, blues, reds,
    browns, blacks, and gold with shimmering iridescence. The experience is similar
    to that of the late circular radiating paintings of first generation Abstract
    Expressionist Richard Pousette-Dart. But

    Stoltzfus’
    composition is less contrived in that it is hinged not on geometry as is the
    case with Pousette-Dart but rather on psychology and in addition his color is
    much more rich.

     

    Stoltzfus is
    an artist that continues to believe in the power of the painted image. He
    continues to push the inherent paradoxical duality of the medium: the
    simultaneous existence of paint as substance and as image. By doing so he
    firmly establishes his position as a proponent of Modernism. This position
    maintains the definition put forth by Clement

    Greenberg in his essay
    Modernist Painting (1960); “ The essence of Modernism lies in the use of
    characteristic methods of a discipline to criticize the discipline itself, not
    in order to subvert it but in order to entrench it more firmly in its area of
    competence.” Although there are many who argue that we are beyond this
    historical moment the evidence is clear that we are not as there continues to
    be significant work made that fits into this classification. Stoltzfus takes on
    this challenge of expanding Modernism and produces tremendous results.

    Comments are closed.