• Hidden in Plain Sight – Andrea Karnes

    Date posted: June 14, 2006 Author: jolanta

    Hidden in Plain Sight

    Andrea Karnes

    Four Surviving Hedge Fragments, 2003, Oil on canvas, 4 x 10 inches (10.2 x 25.4 cm.) Courtesy of the artist and Dunn and Brown Contemporary, Dallas

    Four Surviving Hedge Fragments, 2003, Oil on canvas, 4 x 10 inches (10.2 x 25.4 cm.) Courtesy of the artist and Dunn and Brown Contemporary, Dallas

    Avoiding
    the picturesque entirely, Julie Bozzi creates American landscape paintings that
    portray the antiheroic. The artist works sitting in her car, usually at dusk,
    looking through the windshield at her chosen site. Her process is echoed in the
    format of her paintings, which depict narrow stretches of land that, although
    anonymous on many levels, have a distinct familiarity as American places. The
    seemingly natural locations she depicts are actually man-made, utilitarian
    spaces often designed to act as sight or sound barriers on the sides of
    highways or on the edges of cities and suburbs. Because the titles of these
    works occasionally name the site depicted, such as Periphery of Botanic
    Garden (From Remote Parking Lot),2001, the place can be pinpointed by anyone who knows the
    area. However, the artist’s intense treatment of each location puts it in an
    entirely new light. In fact, there is an undercurrent of anxiety that keeps
    Bozzi’s scenes from being benign. These are “outskirts”— the pockets of land
    where you find the empty six-pack. This is where people go who are themselves
    on the fringe.

    Bozzi
    acknowledges the mythic aspect of Texas and its influences on her imagery. She
    is particularly drawn to the ominous sides of the myth: the infamous grassy
    knoll in Dallas linked to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the
    clock tower on the campus of the University of Texas at Austin that deranged
    Vietnam veteran Charles Whitman climbed in order to gun down innocent victims,
    the roadside field on the outskirts of Denton where the notorious serial killer
    Henry Lee Lucas dumped the body of his girlfriend, the prairie field near Waco where
    the Branch Davidian standoff ended in flames. These events occurred in various
    nondescript patches of land in Texas, any of which could be the subject for
    Bozzi’s landscapes, making the works disturbing in that we suspect what might
    be present, even when it remains concealed. p>

    Considering
    the foreboding, isolating nature of a Bozzi landscape, it is not surprising
    that one of her favorite American painters is Albert Pinkham Ryder (1847–1917),
    recognized for his enigmatic pastoral scenes and imaginative, poetic personal
    vision. Ryder looked to the Romantic poets and authors for inspiration, Byron,
    Keats, and Poe among them, to create highly symbolic works, including nocturnal
    seascapes, romantic landscapes, and literary subjects. His unorthodox work ran
    counter to the masculine transcendental Hudson River School painters, and for
    his unique style and subject matter, he was revered among the early modernist
    painters of the twentieth century. Although he often depicts figures within the
    landscape—in works such as Death on a Pale Horse, c. 1896–1908, one of his most
    important—it is again not surprising that one of Bozzi’s favorite paintings of
    his, Weir’s Orchard,
    1885–90 (figure 4) is a brooding, unpopulated scene. Like her works, it displays a simplification of
    form and an atmosphere imbued with mystery.

    Bozzi’s
    imagery also represents an eccentric synthesis of postwar portrayals of the
    American landscape. With progress, westward expansion, and a shift from
    agricultural to industrial development at the turn of the century, landscape
    painting evolved from projecting “the promised land” to mirroring a changing
    nation. Rejecting the romantic grandeur of their predecessors, the early
    twentieth-century Ashcan School created politically charged urban scenes with an
    imagery that acknowledged social problems. Artists involved with the Ashcan
    School, such as Arthur B. Davies, Robert Henri, and John Sloan, depicted, much
    to the distaste of their critics, scenes such as the alleyways and slums of
    inner-city dwellings. In the 1930s and 1940s, nationalism resurfaced with the
    Regionalists, among them Grant Wood, John Steuart Curry, and Thomas Hart
    Benton, who celebrated the American lifestyle by depicting rural scenes in a
    concise manner. Bozzi, with her use of urban sites that can appear rural, might
    be seen as creating gentler versions of these two extremes. However, more than
    the Ashcan School or the Regionalists, Bozzi’s work pays homage to the
    influential American painter Edward Hopper, who was painting at the same time as
    Benton and the Regionalists, but operated on the opposite end of the landscape
    spectrum.

    Hopper
    painted the so-called “American scene,” but rather than being nationalistic,
    his works are personal and charged with a psychological impact, often conveying
    loneliness and the vacuity of city life. In his “Notes on Painting,” Hopper
    writes, “The question of the value of nationality in art is perhaps unsolvable.
    In general it can be said that a nation’s art is greatest when it most reflects
    the character of its people Bozzi’s work indicates that she, like
    Hopper, acknowledges a darkness within the American character. Her imagery
    also relates to Hopper’s in terms of composition, often presenting a
    horizontal, highly representational space with nearly flat masses of color. Her
    Nondescript Border of Mixed Varieties of Trees, a gouache from 1993, for example,
    depicts a stacked view of a road and trees. From the foreground to the
    background, the picture frankly describes a narrow strip of asphalt, grass, a
    row of trees, and a still blue sky with a few scattered clouds. When compared
    to a late Hopper entitled Road and Trees, 1962, the visual similarities, choice of subject
    matter, and atmosphere come together to create a clear lineage from the older
    to the younger artist. Bozzi’s work is extremely scaled down and condensed, but
    both artists depict a straightforward, sober American landscape without epic
    markers or glorifications.

    While
    typical landscape paintings invite the viewer in along diagonals receding into
    space, Bozzi’s compositions are invariably frontal. The illusion of space is
    created almost entirely through overlapping. In many cases, a barrier such as a
    wall, hedgerow, fence, or road makes up a significant part of the composition,
    denying easy access to the space beyond. In this way, her landscapes reflect
    the acute objectivity of her own time. As she matured as an artist in the
    1970s, Minimalism was in full force, and Bozzi was clearly influenced by
    elements within the movement, applying some of its characteristics to
    representational objects. Her non-hierarchical compositions, stripped-down
    colors, and the frontality of her pictorial field relate specifically to
    Minimalist sculpture. An early work, Immature Tomato Field and Mt. Diablo,
    Davis, California,
    1977, clearly exemplifies this format. Bozzi uses a frontal composition
    (without perspective points to create depth) with bands of color moving from
    front to back to describe a green tomato field as seen from the side of the
    road. This type of format and treatment of the landscape has developed into her
    conscious and permanent style.

    Bozzi’s
    close-cropped imagery also signifies her interest in and involvement with
    photography, perhaps most clearly relating to a new wave of photographers who
    emerged in the 1970s in the wake of Minimalist strategies, summarized within
    the movement known as New Topographics. This group of artists depicted a
    landscape severely drained of romance, nostalgia, and heroism, creating works
    with a reverse sensibility of the landscape photographers who came before them,
    such as Timothy O’Sullivan and Ansel Adams, who, like the early landscape
    painters, exalted the American West in their imagery.

    Robert
    Adams, considered part of the New Topographic movement, used photography to record
    an unflinching look at man’s impact on the land. A mobile home park, a row of
    cookie-cutter houses with almost bare lots and overhead telephone poles and
    electrical wires, and a tree surrounded by litter in a ditch on the side of the
    highway all become subjects of Adams’s work. Like Adams’s photographs, Bozzi’s
    landscapes portray transitional spaces, which are often obsolete or “dead.” In Damaged
    Hedgerow, 1987,
    for example, a row of shrubs, obviously planted as part of a city or state
    plan, has been neglected to the point of appearing to be in a shabby state of
    ruin. Yet each damaged shrub is transformed into a thing of importance by
    Bozzi’s isolated and concentrated treatment of it. Although she jokes about her
    technique and subject matter, referring to herself as “a voyeur of the
    mundane,” her scenes contain a sense of romance absent in Adams’s work. Bozzi
    presents something less overtly bleak or political—hers are more subtle, lush,
    and intimate spaces of discomfort.

    In the
    catalogue that accompanied the 1992 exhibition of her body of work depicting
    food, American Food: Julie Bozzi, the artist quotes a question posed in the 1981 film My
    Dinner with Andr�“Why do we require a trip to Mount Everest in order to be able to perceive one
    moment of reality?”That question sums up what Bozzi’s
    landscapes, as well as her food motifs, repeatedly ask us to consider. Choosing
    the atypical view and avoiding the panoramic vista, Bozzi creates landscapes
    that are, rather than romantically sublime like early American painters and
    photographers, or romantically void, like Adams and the other New Topographers,
    perhaps somewhere in the middle—romantically bland. They make us take note of
    the places we usually ignore, and they instigate a search for meaning in the landscape.
    “In my work,” Bozzi explains, “the neglected is treated very seriously,
    imparting value to the valueless, and this feeds into my ideas of myself as an
    explorer, like Charles Darwin on the voyage of the Beagle, finding things of
    interest that others have overlooked.”

    Edward Hopper, “Notes on Painting,”
    quoted in Lloyd Goodrich, Catalogue for Edward Hopper Retrospective
    Exhibition (New York:
    Whitney Museum of American Art in association with Harry N. Abrams, 1950): 162.
    Originally published in A. H. Barr, Jr., Catalogue for Edward Hopper:
    Retrospective Exhibition(New York: The Museum of Modern Art, 1933).

    The exhibition New Topographics:
    Photographers of a Man-Altered Landscape, curated by William Jenkins and presented at the Eastman
    House in Rochester, New York in 1975, featured Robert Adams, Bernd and Hilla
    Becher, Lewis Baltz, Nicholas Nixon, and others. The exhibition established the
    movement in a public way.

    Wallace Shawn and Andr� Gregory, My
    Dinner with Andr� (New
    York: Grove Press, 1981). Quoted in American Food: Julie Bozzi (San Diego: Museum of Contemporary Art,
    San Diego, 1992). See Biography of the Artist for exhibition dates and tour
    details.

    Letter to the author, April 25, 2003.
    Darwin set sail on the H.M.S. Beagle with Captain Robert Fitz Roy on a
    circumnavigational voyage that lasted from 1831 to 1836. Darwin, the ship’s
    naturalist, eventually used his resulting notes and research to formulate his
    theory of evolution by natural selection.

    Comments are closed.