• Gestural Beckoning

    Date posted: December 2, 2010 Author: jolanta
    Marcin Cienski summons the intangible. Using old photographs, pictures from magazines, personal artifacts, and memories as source material, the Poland-born, Berlin-based artist creates lush, exquisitely rendered oil paintings that tap into our collective unconscious. His moody, sometimes sinister work fuses the ordinary with the unsettling. While the objects and scenes he portrays seem familiar, his paintings are nonetheless puzzling. Akin to film stills, they offer the potential for narrative, but ultimately remain unresolved. Cienski does not want viewers to be pinned down by literal interpretations. Rather, he encourages them to draw from their own experiences and interior states.

    Serena Bentley

    Marcin Cienski, Marshall, 2010. Oil on canvas, 160 x 200 cm. Courtesy of the artist.

    Marcin Cienski summons the intangible. Using old photographs, pictures from magazines, personal artifacts, and memories as source material, the Poland-born, Berlin-based artist creates lush, exquisitely rendered oil paintings that tap into our collective unconscious. His moody, sometimes sinister work fuses the ordinary with the unsettling. While the objects and scenes he portrays seem familiar, his paintings are nonetheless puzzling. Akin to film stills, they offer the potential for narrative, but ultimately remain unresolved. Cienski does not want viewers to be pinned down by literal interpretations. Rather, he encourages them to draw from their own experiences and interior states.

    But viewers do not descend into these visions completely, for Cienski’s technical execution is also significant. The jewel-like colors and lush shadows convey the marks of the maker—brush strokes are always evident. Their presence reminds viewers that they are involved in painterly acts of representation and interpretation. “I do not want paintings to imitate photography,” Cienski says. “I am keen on remaining true to the medium of oil paint that enables a creation of an independent, parallel reality on canvas with painterly means.”

    The painter maintains that his art must not be solely intellectual. As such, Cienski’s desire to tap into a “sacred source” (religious or otherwise) is important. Raised a Catholic, Cienski examines the spiritual in a way that is all encompassing—previous series involve ancient church interiors alongside kitschy weeping Madonnas. But Cienski never passes judgment. Rather than suggesting that one type of devotion is more significant than another, his work encourages quiet contemplation with its overarching sense of ambiguity. This extends to his examinations of the living. The figures he paints are often self-contained and lost in thought. On occasion their interiority manifests itself in physical afflictions as characters appear grasped by illness, and these ideas of entrapment or an invisible threat are central to the artist’s practice.

    Cienski’s motivations are not easily articulated. He describes his works as conduits for messages larger than himself, and maintains that “great art cannot be reasoned out. It comes from a source that cannot be described with smart words and theories.” For Cienski, “a painting shouldn’t mean but be.” As viewers may try and fight their desire to understand, Cienski’s visions of the inscrutable remain welcomingly seductive.

    Comments are closed.