The human body is a slippery surface upon which discourses of race, class, gender, and sexuality are mediated, and thus it is a contested scientific, political, ethical, cultural, economic, and social site. Since human subjectivity and identity are linked to the changing perceptions of vision and visualization, we make and remake our visual experiences of the world within these different contexts. In diagnostic imaging, the areas of visualization, medicine, and technology come together. Using the term “divining” synonymously with “diagnosing,” the exhibition title Divining Fragments: Reconciling the Body style=’font-size:8.0pt;font-family:Verdana;color:black’> refers to the history of diagnostics, from prognosticating over the internal organs of animals and ill gotten human specimens to visualizing the unseeable through dissection, microscopy, sonograms, x-rays, CAT, MRI and PET scans, including alternative techniques like phrenology, Kirlian and aura photography, as well as total body scanning from military applications.
Confronted with a public presentation of our own private exposed anatomy we experience the loss of boundaries and control, evoking issues of physicality, vulnerability, and mortality. Through the imaging and re-imagining of the human body these visual technologies have a profound impact on human self-understanding and behavior, often through implications outside of clinical application, and bring the relationships between health and knowledge under essential scrutiny, questioning the way that meaning is negotiated. The manufacturers of these machines would have us believe that their technologies produce unbiased images that reveal truths about an individual’s condition, but discrepancies exist between “machine vision” and “human vision.” Much of the psychophysical data used in the past to engineer high-performance networked imaging systems is not consistent with the current knowledge of the human nervous system, and compensating enhancements of the image risk misinterpretation and the introduction of artifacts. The designs of information transmitting, storing and processing devices need a better fit between opto-electronics and human nervous systems.
Historically, the partial or fragmented image suggested grief and nostalgia for the loss of a vanished totality and a utopian wholeness. In diagnostic imaging the body is examined in detail, piecemeal and irreconciled, described in terms of “cuts” and “slices.” The body’s pieces, viewed as relics and synecdoches, constitute deconstructed images of humans and problematize issues of creation and re-creation, existence and mortality, integration and dissolution, especially when the images of the dematerialized body are solely transduced from digital code, existing as pure information.
Anatomical dissection has traditionally been the basis of studying the human body in health and disease despite the ban on human dissection that existed intermittently throughout the history of medicine. We acknowledge that DaVinci’s detailed anatomical studies were done covertly, paradoxically at a time when art and science were more closely aligned than today. When Andreas Vesalius published “De Humani Corporis Fabrica” in 1543, it had the same comprehensive impact that modern medical imaging technology had on our view of the human body: it changed human consciousness, and created new anatomists.
Mark Kessell’s prints of a sagitally-sectioned head, “The Intersection of Self” (2003) and a pile of flayed, dissected arms, “Continuing to Act” (2003) refer to the pre-history of diagnostic imaging when the study of gross anatomy with its skills of dissection and direct visualization of the skeleton, organs and tissues was one of the primary tools for training physicians in the detection of disease and normal variants. An amazing find by vintage photography dealer David Winter was a series of photograms, which turned out to be transparent sections of a human body from a New York hospital in the 1920-1930s. These images resemble but obviously predate CAT scans and were likely created from cryosections, and they are unique in the way they show both bone and soft tissue in exquisite detail, especially muscles bundled in fascia. In the paramedial sagittal view, the headless body is abstracted, marked by the dramatic dark diagonal stripes of the dense ribs.
When the field of medicine was transformed from a primarily tactile and aural diagnostic practice into a visual practice by the introduction of roentgen rays, the medical body collided with the social body. This was in the late Victorian era when even the legs of furniture were being covered, and protests were launched about the indecency of this new viewing of the human body. The x-ray is a pivotal site of the exploration of medicine’s visual knowledge and power. Before their full effects were discovered, x-rays were used in the treatment of acne and fluoroscopes were used in stores as an aid to fitting shoes; and, of course, this put people at increased risk for injury, mutations, and cancer from radiation exposure. X-rays are part of the treatment regimen for cancer, but they were used for involuntary sterilization in by the Nazis, and were a basis for the military “death ray.” One of the first uses of medical imaging in contemporary art appeared in Rauschenberg’s Booster style=’font-size:8.0pt;font-family:Verdana;color:black’> (1967), and it consists of five separate x-rays of the artist’s body reassembled in a six foot art piece. David Webster is an artist whose work is devoted to the physiologic and anatomic, including sculptures, photographs, and paintings depicting histology, disease, and dysfunction. His series in the exhibition are those of mudras, hand positions of the Buddha that constitute a highly stylized form of gestural communication. Of those depicted in his lightbox piece Six Sacred Positions of Buddha (1995) the Dharmachakra mudra denotes the setting of the wheel of the teaching of the dharma into motion. Webster’s x-ray images using his own hands in mudras are hauntingly poignant, for they penetrate his own physicality and vulnerability. As a result of an illness that required her to have multiple x-rays, Kuni� Sugiura was inspired to create her Rack (1996) series consisting of photograms assembled from collected x-rays of anonymous patients. Intrigued by her unfamiliarity with the people whose images she was handling, she was additionally inspired by the connection between the medical assessment of their inner parts and the inner aspects of her own artistic expression. Created in isolation in the darkroom, these photograms provided her with a rewarding link to society at large and a satisfying means of recycling these discarded images. Postcard-sized photograms made from roentgenograms of skulls, chests, and spines are mounted in a found postcard holder, tethered tensely between the floor and ceiling at roughly anatomical position.
The sonogram produces an image on the basis of sound waves reflected back to a source as a function of density and lucency of organs, tissues, and fluid, and has found wide application in the assessment of fetuses and pregnancies. Steve Miller created L’Origine du Monde (1994), a large silkscreen painting of a sonogram of twin girls with a reference to Courbet’s infamous work, bracketed by a radar-like sweep of paint above, and an EKG tracing below. The artist is deeply invested in the fields of science and technology, and his works draw from iconic images, cartography, and the medical body to address the ways that identity is constructed.
Taking cartography further are the pioneering works of Lilla LoCurto and William Outcault. Like phrenology yet unlike medical diagnostic imaging devices, these images are derived only from the surface of the artists’ bodies despite their resemblance to the “cuts” of internal scanning technologies. Their image-making process involves total body scans from military application modified by programs developed in conjunction with a computer scientist and two mathematicians to map the volumetric body in 2-D, the same goal of simultaneity sought by the Cubist artists. The work in the exhibition Storyboard#4-5 style=’font-size:8.0pt;font-family:Verdana;color:black’> (2003) is a still taken from a video that depicts the same imaging technology, where the angle of the “slice” is programmed to change, resulting in an astounding violently poetic calligraphic image, just recognizable as the sectioned and unraveled bodies of the artists.
Advanced medical imaging technologies came into clinical use in successive decades: CAT in the 70s, MRI in the 80s, and PET in the 90s. Unlike CAT scans that rely on the summation of x-ray images and PET scans that rely on the decay of an injected radioactive pharmaceutical, MRI does not involve radiation, but instead uses a powerful magnet and the spin of hydrogen atoms in the body’s water to generate images. It is astonishing to think of MRI and PET scans as the body’s way of illuminating itself from within through subatomic particles. The online Visible Human Project, sponsored by the National Library of Medicine, imaged the bodies of an executed murderer and a female body using the full array of medical imaging technologies including transverse CT, MR, and cryosection images. The male was sectioned at one millimeter intervals, the female at one third of a millimeter intervals. The long-term goal of the project is to produce a system of knowledge structure that will transparently link visual knowledge forms to symbolic knowledge formats such as the names of body parts. In his untitled 2002 piece, Patrick Martinez has taken the successive slices from the project and placed them in rapid sequence to create images of expanding and contracting abstractions, giving one the mesmerizing sensation of traveling through the body at great speed.
Justine Cooper’s spectrally elegant sculpture Reach style=’font-size:8.0pt;font-family:Verdana;color:black’> (2000) consists of planar sections of her hands and forearms from MRI data printed on stacked glass sheets re assembled in 3-D that impel the viewer to move around in space to reconcile the pieces back into a coherent whole, mirroring the translation and deciphering processes of MRI while making the interstitial areas the viewer’s spaces.
The Cartesian split results from the collision of paradigms between faith and empiricism, logic and intuition; and should be remembered when society is willing to abdicate rationality and responsibility to science and technology in the creation of machines that we are led to believe will tell us the truth about ourselves. One must recall that the original information produced by MRI is numerical, not visual, and that the process of reassembling the original body image can be a conflicted re-presentation. Metal in or on the body, breathing, and even the movement of blood can produce artifacts termed “cross talk” that appear as white dots created when the MRI “slices” are too close together. The very existence of these artifacts refute the notion of MRI making the body transparent and the image equivalent to the body since the production process involves the designation of twenty parameters, each of which affects how the final image appears and what it does and does not show. MRI images, reconstructed from pure information, should also be understood as knowledge that is influenced by social context and human decisions and they should not be separated from the discussions of the people and institutions that construct and control them. That there are dire consequences of equating photos with the real have been pointed out by cultural critics John Berger and Susan Sontag. Medical images circulate similarly within this belief system and are also often thought to be equivalent to the bodies represented within them. Realizing that MRI images are only re presentations and partial truths empowers us to recognize the political, social, and economic factors that affect the interpretation of these images.
Warren Neidich’s indexical renderings of heads resemble CAT scans, but in actuality are photographs of light “paintings” depicting heads in profile that were part of his project studying prosopagnosia, the inability to recognize faces, including one’s own. Robert #2 is from the Blanqui’s Cosmology series (1999-2002) that reminded the artist of phrenology, a respected hard science in the 19th century that analyzed character through the overall shape of and protuberances on the skull. When the same outlines were noted to resemble ring nebulae and other cosmologic references, Neidich’s natural scientific curiosity and interest in systems formulated this creative bifid reading of his work.
At the other end of the magnifying lens is Jeff Wyckoff, a cancer and AIDS research scientist whose position allows him to work at the forefront of new technology. His piece Alpha-Omega style=’font-size:8.0pt;font-family:Verdana;color:black’> (2003) presents a new view of cardiac and tumor tissues through multi photon microscopy that works by sending a high wavelength infrared laser into a standard light microscope. When two beams join at the focal plane, the sum of the wavelengths creates light at normal light microscope wavelengths with the advantage of deeper penetration and less phototoxicity. With the imagery, he presents a menu of accompanying music created by four different composers in varying styles.
In the 1930s the Russian technician Semyon D. Kirlian discovered a means of showing film imprints of electromagnetic energy as unique fields of color in living organisms. These photographs may have first been applied as diagnostic tools or as aids to behavioral modification. Chrysanne Stathacos has traveled widely to record the results of both psychic and somatic phenomena through biofeedback plates onto Polaroid portraits of mystics and sadhus that show surrounding clouds of brilliant varying colors but the artist leaves all interpretations open-ended.
These deployments of medical imaging pictures by contemporary visual artists reflect the innovative and alternative perspectives that art often offers to science with its pursuit of material truths, while acknowledging that both art and science are investigated by social beings within social contexts. |