• Divining Fragments: Reconciling the Body – K�an-Jeff Baysa

    Date posted: June 15, 2006 Author: jolanta

    Divining Fragments: Reconciling the Body

    K�an-Jeff Baysa
     

    Patrick Martinez, Untitled, 2002, video installation, with assistance from the National Library of Medicine.

    Patrick Martinez, Untitled, 2002, video installation, with assistance from the National Library of Medicine.

    The
    human body is a slippery surface upon which discourses of race, class, gender,
    and sexuality are mediated, and thus it is a contested scientific, political,
    ethical, cultural, economic, and social site. Since human subjectivity and
    identity are linked to the changing perceptions of vision and visualization, we
    make and remake our visual experiences of the world within these different
    contexts. In diagnostic imaging, the areas of visualization, medicine, and
    technology come together. Using the term “divining” synonymously with
    “diagnosing,” the exhibition title Divining Fragments: Reconciling the Body
    style=’font-size:8.0pt;font-family:Verdana;color:black’> refers to the history
    of diagnostics, from prognosticating over the internal organs of animals and
    ill gotten human specimens to visualizing the unseeable through dissection,
    microscopy, sonograms, x-rays, CAT, MRI and PET scans, including alternative
    techniques like phrenology, Kirlian and aura photography, as well as total body
    scanning from military applications.

     

    Confronted
    with a public presentation of our own private exposed anatomy we experience the
    loss of boundaries and control, evoking issues of physicality, vulnerability,
    and mortality. Through the imaging and re-imagining of the human body these
    visual technologies have a profound impact on human self-understanding and
    behavior, often through implications outside of clinical application, and bring
    the relationships between health and knowledge under essential scrutiny,
    questioning the way that meaning is negotiated. The manufacturers of these
    machines would have us believe that their technologies produce unbiased images
    that reveal truths about an individual’s condition, but discrepancies exist
    between “machine vision” and “human vision.” Much of the psychophysical data
    used in the past to engineer high-performance networked imaging systems is not
    consistent with the current knowledge of the human nervous system, and
    compensating enhancements of the image risk misinterpretation and the
    introduction of artifacts. The designs of information transmitting, storing and
    processing devices need a better fit between opto-electronics and human nervous
    systems.

     

    Historically,
    the partial or fragmented image suggested grief and nostalgia for the loss of a
    vanished totality and a utopian wholeness.  In diagnostic imaging the body is examined in detail,
    piecemeal and irreconciled, described in terms of “cuts” and “slices.” The
    body’s pieces, viewed as relics and synecdoches, constitute deconstructed
    images of humans and problematize issues of creation and re-creation, existence
    and mortality, integration and dissolution, especially when the images of the
    dematerialized body are solely transduced from digital code, existing as pure
    information.

     

    Anatomical
    dissection has traditionally been the basis of studying the human body in
    health and disease despite the ban on human dissection that existed
    intermittently throughout the history of medicine. We acknowledge that
    DaVinci’s detailed anatomical studies were done covertly, paradoxically at a
    time when art and science were more closely aligned than today. When Andreas
    Vesalius published “De Humani Corporis Fabrica” in 1543, it had the same
    comprehensive impact that modern medical imaging technology had on our view of
    the human body: it changed human consciousness, and created new anatomists.

     

    Mark
    Kessell’s prints of a sagitally-sectioned head, “The Intersection of Self”
    (2003) and a pile of flayed, dissected arms, “Continuing to Act” (2003) refer
    to the pre-history of diagnostic imaging when the study of gross anatomy with
    its skills of dissection and direct visualization of the skeleton, organs and
    tissues was one of the primary tools for training physicians in the detection
    of disease and normal variants. An amazing find by vintage photography dealer
    David Winter was a series of photograms, which turned out to be transparent
    sections of a human body from a New York hospital in the 1920-1930s. These
    images resemble but obviously predate CAT scans and were likely created from
    cryosections, and they are unique in the way they show both bone and soft
    tissue in exquisite detail, especially muscles bundled in fascia. In the
    paramedial sagittal view, the headless body is abstracted, marked by the
    dramatic dark diagonal stripes of the dense ribs.

     

    When
    the field of medicine was transformed from a primarily tactile and aural
    diagnostic practice into a visual practice by the introduction of roentgen
    rays, the medical body collided with the social body. This was in the late
    Victorian era when even the legs of furniture were being covered, and protests
    were launched about the indecency of this new viewing of the human body. The
    x-ray is a pivotal site of the exploration of medicine’s visual knowledge and
    power. Before their full effects were discovered, x-rays were used in the
    treatment of acne and fluoroscopes were used in stores as an aid to fitting
    shoes; and, of course, this put people at increased risk for injury, mutations,
    and cancer from radiation exposure. X-rays are part of the treatment regimen
    for cancer, but they were used for involuntary sterilization in by the Nazis,
    and were a basis for the military “death ray.” One of the first uses of medical
    imaging in contemporary art appeared in Rauschenberg’s Booster
    style=’font-size:8.0pt;font-family:Verdana;color:black’> (1967), and it
    consists of five separate x-rays of the artist’s body reassembled in a six foot
    art piece. David Webster is an artist whose work is devoted to the physiologic
    and anatomic, including sculptures, photographs, and paintings depicting
    histology, disease, and dysfunction. His series in the exhibition are those of
    mudras, hand positions of the Buddha that constitute a highly stylized form of
    gestural communication. Of those depicted in his lightbox piece Six Sacred
    Positions of Buddha (1995) the Dharmachakra mudra denotes the setting of the wheel of
    the teaching of the dharma into motion. Webster’s x-ray images using his own
    hands in mudras are hauntingly poignant, for they penetrate his own physicality
    and vulnerability.  As a result of
    an illness that required her to have multiple x-rays, Kuni� Sugiura was
    inspired to create her Rack (1996) series consisting of photograms
    assembled from collected x-rays of anonymous patients. Intrigued by her
    unfamiliarity with the people whose images she was handling, she was
    additionally inspired by the connection between the medical assessment of their
    inner parts and the inner aspects of her own artistic expression. Created in
    isolation in the darkroom, these photograms provided her with a rewarding link
    to society at large and a satisfying means of recycling these discarded images.
    Postcard-sized photograms made from roentgenograms of skulls, chests, and
    spines are mounted in a found postcard holder, tethered tensely between the
    floor and ceiling at roughly anatomical position.

     

    The
    sonogram produces an image on the basis of sound waves reflected back to a
    source as a function of density and lucency of organs, tissues, and fluid, and
    has found wide application in the assessment of fetuses and pregnancies. Steve
    Miller created  L’Origine du
    Monde
    (1994), a large silkscreen painting of a sonogram of twin girls with a
    reference to Courbet’s infamous work, bracketed by a radar-like sweep of paint
    above, and an EKG tracing below. The artist is deeply invested in the fields of
    science and technology, and his works draw from iconic images, cartography, and
    the medical body to address the ways that identity is constructed.

     

    Taking
    cartography further are the pioneering works of Lilla LoCurto and William
    Outcault. Like phrenology yet unlike medical diagnostic imaging devices, these
    images are derived only from the surface of the artists’ bodies despite their
    resemblance to the “cuts” of internal scanning technologies. Their image-making
    process involves total body scans from military application modified by
    programs developed in conjunction with a computer scientist and two
    mathematicians to map the volumetric body in 2-D, the same goal of simultaneity
    sought by the Cubist artists. The work in the exhibition Storyboard#4-5
    style=’font-size:8.0pt;font-family:Verdana;color:black’> (2003) is a still
    taken from a video that depicts the same imaging technology, where the angle of
    the “slice” is programmed to change, resulting in an astounding violently
    poetic calligraphic image, just recognizable as the sectioned and unraveled
    bodies of the artists.

     

    Advanced
    medical imaging technologies came into clinical use in successive decades: CAT
    in the 70s, MRI in the 80s, and PET in the 90s. Unlike CAT scans that rely on
    the summation of x-ray images and PET scans that rely on the decay of an
    injected radioactive pharmaceutical, MRI does not involve radiation, but
    instead uses a powerful magnet and the spin of hydrogen atoms in the body’s
    water to generate images. It is astonishing to think of MRI and PET scans as
    the body’s way of  illuminating
    itself from within through subatomic particles. The online Visible Human
    Project,
    sponsored by the National Library of Medicine, imaged the bodies of an executed
    murderer and a female body using the full array of medical imaging technologies
    including transverse CT, MR, and cryosection images. The male was sectioned at
    one millimeter intervals, the female at one third of a millimeter intervals.
    The long-term goal of the project is to produce a system of knowledge structure
    that will transparently link visual knowledge forms to symbolic knowledge
    formats such as the names of body parts. In his untitled 2002 piece, Patrick
    Martinez has taken the successive slices from the project and placed them in
    rapid sequence to create images of expanding and contracting abstractions,
    giving one the mesmerizing sensation of traveling through the body at great
    speed.

     

    Justine
    Cooper’s spectrally elegant sculpture Reach
    style=’font-size:8.0pt;font-family:Verdana;color:black’> (2000) consists of
    planar sections of her hands and forearms from MRI data printed on stacked
    glass sheets re assembled in 3-D that impel the viewer to move around in space
    to reconcile the pieces back into a coherent whole, mirroring the translation
    and deciphering processes of MRI while making the interstitial areas the
    viewer’s spaces.

     

    The
    Cartesian split results from the collision of paradigms between faith and
    empiricism, logic and intuition; and should be remembered when society is
    willing to abdicate rationality and responsibility to science and technology in
    the creation of machines that we are led to believe will tell us the truth
    about ourselves. One must recall that the original information produced by MRI
    is numerical, not visual, and that the process of reassembling the original
    body image can be a conflicted re-presentation. Metal in or on the body,
    breathing, and even the movement of blood can produce artifacts termed “cross
    talk” that appear as white dots created when the MRI “slices” are too close
    together. The very existence of these artifacts refute the notion of MRI making
    the body transparent and the image equivalent to the body since the production
    process involves the designation of twenty parameters, each of which affects
    how the final image appears and what it does and does not show. MRI images,
    reconstructed from pure information, should also be understood as knowledge
    that is influenced by social context and human decisions and they should not be
    separated from the discussions of the people and institutions that construct
    and control them. That there are dire consequences of equating photos with the
    real have been pointed out by cultural critics John Berger and Susan Sontag.
    Medical images circulate similarly within this belief system and are also often
    thought to be equivalent to the bodies represented within them. Realizing that
    MRI images are only re presentations and partial truths empowers us to
    recognize the political, social, and economic factors that affect the
    interpretation of these images.

     

    Warren
    Neidich’s indexical renderings of heads resemble CAT scans, but in actuality
    are photographs of light “paintings” depicting heads in profile that were part
    of his project studying prosopagnosia, the inability to recognize faces,
    including one’s own. Robert #2 is from the Blanqui’s Cosmology series
    (1999-2002) that reminded the artist of phrenology, a respected hard science in
    the 19th century that analyzed character through the overall shape of and
    protuberances on the skull. When the same outlines were noted to resemble ring
    nebulae and other cosmologic references, Neidich’s natural scientific curiosity
    and interest in systems formulated this creative bifid reading of his work.

     

    At
    the other end of the magnifying lens is Jeff Wyckoff, a cancer and AIDS
    research scientist whose position allows him to work at the forefront of new
    technology.  His piece Alpha-Omega
    style=’font-size:8.0pt;font-family:Verdana;color:black’> (2003) presents a new
    view of cardiac and tumor tissues through multi photon microscopy that works by
    sending a high wavelength infrared laser into a standard light microscope. When
    two beams join at the focal plane, the sum of the wavelengths creates light at
    normal light microscope wavelengths with the advantage of deeper penetration
    and less phototoxicity. With the imagery, he presents a menu of accompanying
    music created by four different composers in varying styles.

     

    In
    the 1930s the Russian technician Semyon D. Kirlian discovered a means of
    showing film imprints of electromagnetic energy as unique fields of color in
    living organisms. These photographs may have first been applied as diagnostic
    tools or as aids to behavioral modification. Chrysanne Stathacos has traveled
    widely to record the results of both psychic and somatic phenomena through
    biofeedback plates onto Polaroid portraits of  mystics and sadhus that show surrounding clouds of brilliant
    varying colors but the artist leaves all interpretations open-ended.

     

    These
    deployments of medical imaging pictures by contemporary visual artists reflect
    the innovative and alternative perspectives that art often offers to science
    with its pursuit of material truths, while acknowledging that both art and
    science are investigated by social beings within social contexts.

    Comments are closed.