• ABSTRACTION NOW – Andr�s Ram�rez Gavirias

    Date posted: June 15, 2006 Author: jolanta

    ABSTRACTION NOW

    Andr�s Ram�rez Gavirias

    Curated by
    Norbert Pfaffenbichler and co-curators Sandro Droschl, Sixpackfilm and Lia and
    Miguel Carvalhais, ABSTRACTION NOW brings together current non-representational
    trends in art centered mostly on audiovisual media. The exhibition, excellently
    organized by its curators, covers the work of a group of young artists who
    display ingenious approaches to abstract themes, as seen not only through the
    use of techniques afforded by new media, but also, in more noteworthy
    instances, in relationship to some of the most outstanding artistic practices
    of modernism.

     

    Abstraction,
    rarely used as a concept in current discourse,  can be divided, from a historical perspective, into two
    groups: on the one hand, organic, lyrical, and gestural works, and on the
    other, their mathematical, precise, cerebral opposites.
    style="mso-spacerun: yes">  The artists represented in ABSTRACTION
    NOW belong to the second group.
    Influenced by the rigid accuracy of the abstract compositions of various
    modernist movements, many of them associate abstraction with the language of
    technology that has become available to them with the recent advent of the
    computer age. Partly because of its minimalist contours, the creative act can
    be more closely equated here to such figures as Piet Mondrian, Barnett Neuman,
    Kenneth Noland, Ellsworth Kelly, Karl Andr�, among others, than to the
    so-called "Expressionists" of the 1950s.

     

    Most of
    the references to trends in Modernism in the current exhibition are direct and
    are the fundamental factor for grasping the nuances
    within the various meanings of a work. A notable
    example would be G�nther Selichar’s 1996 work, Who is afraid of Blue, Red, and Green
    style=’font-size:8.0pt;font-family:Verdana’>, which alludes to and
    retextualizes Piet Mondrian’s theory of the use of yellow, red and blue (Composition
    in Red, Yellow and Blue) as the underlying color structure of asymmetrical arrangements.
    Selichar’s work consists of three panels illustrating the colors red, green and
    blue–pulverized onto the surface rather than painted–in assorted vertical
    strips. Today, many traditional art practices have been largely modified,by the
    computer, which employs  the RGB
    (Red, Green and Blue) model to display on-screen information. The piece, with
    its perceptive title, Who Is Afraid of Blue, Red, and Green
    style=’font-size:8.0pt;font-family:Verdana’>, when seen in the light of the
    technical changes leading from Modernism to Post-Modernism,
    style=’font-size:8.0pt;font-family:Verdana’>takes on fundamental
    significance.  

     

    Similarly,
    the artist David Jourdan’s video loop Mechanics I know,
    style=’font-size:8.0pt;font-family:Verdana’>2003, draws parallels to the past,
    using the game of Chromino (a game similar to dominos where the pieces are
    matched by color rather than number) as its point of departure. The video makes
    ironic comments about Concrete Art, a term coined by Van Doesburg in 1930 to
    designate a group of artists working under the same manifesto. Concrete Art,
    according to its representatives, is based on a mathematical logic where the
    illustrated aspects consist of a uniform, exact, predictable sequence. Using an
    aerial camera angle to mimic the flat appearance of a two-dimensional painting,
    the artist parodies the Modernist movement by constructing a game/picture under
    the rules of Chromino… in an unpredictable fashion.

     

    Another
    significant submission is 8 bit, by the RE-P.org, (Michael Aschauer, Maia Gusberti, Nik
    Thoenen) collective. Located in the Passage Gallery, an exhibition space
    connecting the K�nstlerhaus with the public area, the work has eight
    fluorescent tubes  turning a lot of
    preprogrammed combinations on and off using a binary digital system. This
    playful aspect of the structure lends itself to the exhibition’s general
    aesthetics while further developing the minimalist concept of artists like Dan
    Flavin.  

     

    ABSTRACTION
    NOW, as the previous examples illustrate, is not just another unfurling of new
    media art. Although most of the work – specially image based – is influenced in
    some way by  digital
    style="mso-spacerun: yes">  technologies, the exhibition relies
    heavily on the "classics" of art including painting, sculpture,
    photography, etc., while at the same time revealing how media and style
    diverge.  The thirty
    non-representational video and many other computer-based pieces on CD-ROM and
    DVD, as well as selected Internet projects showing at the K�nstlerhaus-Kino and
    Medialounge, respectively, are a significant plus for the exhibition.
    style="mso-spacerun: yes">

     

    With such
    an abundant collection of national and international artists, it is easy to
    view this sampling as an outstanding phenomenon within the contemporary art
    world:  another chapter in research
    into abstraction as a thematic and aesthetic genre. At the start of the 21st
    century, the present trend, led by the next generation,
    style="mso-spacerun: yes">  is to be appreciated for its
    relationship with modernist abstraction, but also in terms of a logic peculiar
    to its own technological means. On the other hand, the K�nstlerhaus Wien, where
    the exhibition is being held, was opened in 1945 as a cultural platform, but
    has lately been having funding problems.
    This will be the center’s last show —  an ironic twist of fate, since the exhibition was one of the
    best the center has held in recent years.

    Comments are closed.